Curriculum / Semester 1 / Progress Tracker / Weekly Sprint Logs

Weekly Sprint Logs

Weekly Sprint Logs

Copy this section for each week. Keep entries brief — one to three minutes each.


Week 1: Enter the 12-Bar Laboratory

Deliverable: Baseline 12-bar recording — pulse and simple support only.

Sessions completed: ___ / 5 planned

Recording completed: Y / N

Self-evaluation — listen to the recording and answer these questions:

  1. Did you complete all 12 bars without stopping? If you stopped, which bar?
  2. Did your tempo stay consistent, or did it slow down or rush at any point?
  3. Can you hear a clear pulse — a rhythmic foundation — throughout the entire chorus?
  4. Was there at least one moment of silence (not playing) that felt deliberate rather than accidental?
  5. Does the recording sound like a musical beginning, or does it sound like someone figuring out what to do?

One thing to improve:

One thing that worked:


Week 2: Call, Response, and Groove Gravity

Deliverable: One 12-bar chorus with call-and-response spaces.

Sessions completed: ___ / 5 planned

Recording completed: Y / N

Self-evaluation — listen to the recording and answer these questions:

  1. Did you feel the 12-bar cycle as three four-bar sections, or did you lose track of where you were?
  2. Did your tempo stay steady, or did it rush in the third bar?
  3. Was there at least one moment of deliberate silence — a space that felt like a musical response was expected?
  4. Did the silence sound like a pause in a musical conversation, or like a mistake?
  5. Can you hear the difference between where the phrase calls and where it responds?

One thing to improve:

One thing that worked:


Week 3: Triad Support and 027 Color Object

Deliverable: One 12-bar chorus using triad support plus one optional 027 color moment.

Sessions completed: ___ / 5 planned

Recording completed: Y / N

Self-evaluation — listen to the recording and answer these questions:

  1. Does the triad support make the form clearer, or does it create confusion about where the chord changes are?
  2. Was the triad functioning as support (backing the harmony) or as a display (showing off the voicing)?
  3. Did the 027 color moment appear in a natural pause, or was it forced into a moment where the harmony needed clarity?
  4. Did the groove stay consistent while you were navigating the triad changes?
  5. Can you identify, in the recording, one moment where the triad support and the groove were coordinated simultaneously?

One thing to improve:

One thing that worked:


Week 4: Month 1 Integration

Deliverable: Month 1 anchor-song study recording and brief written reflection.

Sessions completed: ___ / 5 planned

Recording completed: Y / N

Self-evaluation — listen to the recording and answer these questions:

  1. Are form, time, groove, and one clear musical contribution all present simultaneously in this recording?
  2. Can you hear a specific Aim, Route, and Complete in the chorus — a musical intention from start to finish?
  3. What is the clearest evidence in this recording that Month 1 material has been installed?
  4. What is the most obvious gap — the thing that Month 2 should address first?
  5. If a patient, honest musical friend listened to this recording, what is the one thing they would say you should work on?

Written reflection (three sentences minimum):

One thing to improve:

One thing that worked:


Week 5: Role Awareness and Tension/Release

Deliverable: Two versions of the same chorus — support role and answer role.

Sessions completed: ___ / 5 planned

Recording completed: Y / N

Self-evaluation — listen to both recordings and answer these questions:

  1. Can you hear the difference between the two roles? Would a listener who didn't know your intention hear them as different?
  2. In the support-role version, was there any melodic activity that crept in? (If yes, it was not full support role.)
  3. In the answer-role version, were there genuine silences — spaces that invited a response?
  4. Where in the 12-bar form does tension accumulate? Where does it release? Can you hear these points in the recording?
  5. Which role felt more natural? Why?

One thing to improve:

One thing that worked:


Week 6: Placement, Anticipation, and Stops

Deliverable: The same rhythm cell placed three ways — on-beat, anticipated, stopped.

Sessions completed: ___ / 5 planned

Recording completed: Y / N

Self-evaluation — listen to all three recordings and answer these questions:

  1. Are the three placements audibly distinct? Could someone identify which is on-beat, which is anticipated, which has a stop?
  2. Did the form stay intact through all three variations, or did the placement changes cause you to lose your place?
  3. Which placement felt most natural? Which felt most uncomfortable? Why?
  4. Did the anticipated placement create a sense of forward momentum, or did it feel rushed?
  5. Did the stop feel like a dramatic choice, or like a mistake?

One thing to improve:

One thing that worked:


Week 7: Functional Triad Placement and Motif Development

Deliverable: Four-bar motif developed over a blues phrase.

Sessions completed: ___ / 5 planned

Recording completed: Y / N

Self-evaluation — listen to the recording and answer these questions:

  1. Can you hear that the motif is the same seed throughout, even in its varied versions?
  2. Do the triads sound like they are functioning differently over the I and IV chords, or do they sound interchangeable?
  3. Did the motif wander (adding new notes, losing the original idea), or did it develop (varying only the rhythm and placement of the same core material)?
  4. Was there at least one moment where the motif landed clearly on a strong chord tone?
  5. Did the motif feel like it was saying something, or did it feel like it was filling space?

One thing to improve:

One thing that worked:


Week 8: Month 2 Integration — Multi-Chorus Route

Deliverable: Two- or three-chorus recording with a clear energy route.

Sessions completed: ___ / 5 planned

Recording completed: Y / N

Self-evaluation — listen to the recording and answer these questions:

  1. Can you hear the route — a progression from chorus 1 through chorus 3 — as a purposeful arc?
  2. Was the variation controlled (one dimension changed at a time), or did multiple things change simultaneously in a disorganized way?
  3. Did the form stay intact across all choruses, or did the variation cause you to lose the structure?
  4. Does chorus 3 feel like a resolution or completion, or does it feel like the recording just ran out?
  5. What would you name the route if you described it to someone? (e.g., "sparse to full," "answer-seeking to resolved," "tight to open")

Written route map (three lines — one per chorus):

One thing to improve:

One thing that worked:


Week 9: Subsystem Leadership and Arrangement Roles

Deliverable: Same section played as groove lead, harmonic lead, melodic lead.

Sessions completed: ___ / 5 planned

Recording completed: Y / N

Self-evaluation — listen to all three recordings and answer these questions:

  1. Are the three leadership roles audibly distinct?
  2. In the groove-lead version, did any melodic material creep in? (If yes, not pure groove lead.)
  3. In the harmonic-lead version, was the rhythm minimal and supportive, or was it competing with the harmony?
  4. In the melodic-lead version, did the fill have a clear shape (beginning, development, landing), or was it a scale run?
  5. For each version: what did PDC identify as the musical reason for that leadership choice?

PDC notes (one sentence per version):

  • Groove lead:
  • Harmonic lead:
  • Melodic lead:

One thing to improve:

One thing that worked:


Week 10: Density, Register, and Genre Lenses

Deliverable: Three recordings — sparse, medium, full.

Sessions completed: ___ / 5 planned

Recording completed: Y / N

Self-evaluation — listen to all three recordings and answer these questions:

  1. Is the sparse version actually sparse — one or two elements maximum — or does it sneak to medium density?
  2. Is the full version controlled — multiple elements coordinated — or is it cluttered?
  3. Do all three versions maintain stable form and time, or does density change affect your navigation?
  4. Which density level sounds most like your natural default? Which is hardest to sustain?
  5. Which density level sounds most like The Thrill Is Gone's aesthetic?

One thing to improve:

One thing that worked:


Week 11: Mini-Composition — Fill, Solo, and Chorus Shape

Deliverable: One chorus where every fill has a discernible shape.

Sessions completed: ___ / 5 planned

Recording completed: Y / N

Self-evaluation — listen to the recording and answer these questions:

  1. Can you identify, for each fill: where it begins, where it develops, where it lands?
  2. Did any fill end on a note that felt unresolved or accidental? Which one?
  3. Does the chorus as a whole have a sense of direction — a beginning, a development, and a landing point?
  4. Was there a moment where a fill felt like a genuine musical statement rather than an obligation?
  5. If you removed all the fills and listened to just the groove and support, would the underlying structure be solid?

Fill inventory (list each fill and its ending note):

One thing to improve:

One thing that worked:


Week 12: Capstone Week

Deliverable: Capstone A (primary instrument), Capstone B (secondary instrument), Capstone C (written reflection).

Sessions completed: ___ / 5 planned

Capstone A completed: Y / N

Capstone B completed: Y / N

Capstone C written: Y / N

Self-evaluation — listen to both capstone recordings and answer these questions:

  1. Is the Internal Band present? Can you hear PDC making decisions, Blues Root grounding the feel, Rhythm Cells providing groove, TPS supporting the harmony, SHAPE contributing melodic phrase, CAS-ARC shaping the arc?
  2. What is the strongest element in the primary instrument capstone?
  3. What is the weakest element — the thing that would be the first Semester 2 priority?
  4. Does the secondary instrument capstone reveal the harmony and form more clearly than the primary instrument version, even if it is simpler?
  5. If someone who understood AMF listened to these recordings, what would they say about the state of your Internal Band?

Capstone C — Written Reflection (complete this page):

What the music needed:

What role you chose and why:

How each Internal Band member contributed:

  • PDC:
  • Blues Root:
  • Rhythm Cells:
  • RXP:
  • TPS:
  • SHAPE:
  • CAS-ARC:

What Semester 2 should target first:

One thing you discovered about yourself as a musician in Semester 1: